Comments on: Why Won’t ESPN Pay Attention to Selena Roberts?

By: MDS

MDS — Tue, 12 May 2009 01:46:02 +0000

Duke lacrosse kids innocent??? I guess technically…FN A-rod deserves it

By: Jason

Jason — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:10:48 +0000

Id ESPN talks to her, then they may as well talk to all the bloggers too, because that's all her book is. A gossip blogs with 300 pages of "anonymous sources say"

Also, good point ont he Duke lacrosse thing. She destroyed those kids, long after the rest of the world could obviously say they were innocent.

By: NM

NM — Mon, 11 May 2009 22:56:50 +0000

If she looked like Maria Verchenova, they'd have had her on.

By: Beer-Run

Beer-Run — Mon, 11 May 2009 21:52:18 +0000

Relax Brooks,

I'm sure ESPN is in negotiations w/ A Rod on a semi-reality show to find the truth. I mean, it worked with their coverage of Bonds.

By: Brooks

Brooks — Mon, 11 May 2009 21:44:59 +0000

Right, and ESPN doesn't engage in thin reporting? (See Mort … Hello?)

By: Joe

Joe — Mon, 11 May 2009 20:10:27 +0000

Read the book and the reason is simple…there are very few hard facts in the book. Everything is from an "anonymous source", and there rae many parts where she is just taking an educated guess as to what his motives are and what he is thinking. The book is VERY thin.

By: Beer-Run

Beer-Run — Mon, 11 May 2009 19:13:53 +0000

It's a shame they won't have her, I'd really like to see someone take her to task (besides Whitlock) on her Duke lacrosse coverage and why we should "trust" her.