One of the biggest sports stories so far in 2009 has been the taking-down of Yankees slugger Alex Rodriguez by SPORTS ILLUSTRATED writer Selena Roberts. Whether or not you enjoyed the revelations of steroid abuse, stalking, and tipping pitches, you’ve got to admit that Roberts’ book has been worthy of the lead story on SportsCenter, in bars, and around the water cooler.
So…why won’t ESPN talk to her?
Despite the fact that Selena Roberts is possibly the biggest name in sports media at the moment (sorry, Stephen A.), the NEW YORK POST reports that “ESPN is blackballing the hottest reporter of the week because she snubbed the sports network and gave her first interviews to Bob Costas and the “TODAY” show.”
ESPN, the media equivalent of an alcoholic spouse, has a long history of being thin-skinned and vindictive at the most unexpected turns. Despite living up to their slogan as the Worldwide Leader in Sports, they still harbor an institutional us-vs.-them mentality that goes back to their infancy as in independent also-ran network. Still, banning the author of the most talked-about sports book of the year seems like a harsh move; ESPN was doing a fine job covering the story before the book came out and waiting an extra couple days for a sit-down shouldn’t have been that big of a deal. But was there something else at play? Again, the POST:
Roberts, who rejected a job offer from ESPN and joined SPORTS ILLUSTRATED a year and a half ago, is willing to appear on ESPN, but the sports network won’t put her on.
It took ESPN a year and a half, but it appears they got their revenge for getting turned down by Roberts. Again, these are the actions of an alcoholic spouse, not a major media conglomerate. Should anything happen to Roberts in the future, the authorities may want to check all the storage units in Bristol, CT, for unmarked, foul-smelling oil drums.







3:13 pm on May 11th, 2009
It's a shame they won't have her, I'd really like to see someone take her to task (besides Whitlock) on her Duke lacrosse coverage and why we should "trust" her.
4:10 pm on May 11th, 2009
Read the book and the reason is simple…there are very few hard facts in the book. Everything is from an "anonymous source", and there rae many parts where she is just taking an educated guess as to what his motives are and what he is thinking. The book is VERY thin.
5:44 pm on May 11th, 2009
Right, and ESPN doesn't engage in thin reporting? (See Mort … Hello?)
5:52 pm on May 11th, 2009
Relax Brooks,
I'm sure ESPN is in negotiations w/ A Rod on a semi-reality show to find the truth. I mean, it worked with their coverage of Bonds.
6:56 pm on May 11th, 2009
If she looked like Maria Verchenova, they'd have had her on.
8:10 pm on May 11th, 2009
Id ESPN talks to her, then they may as well talk to all the bloggers too, because that's all her book is. A gossip blogs with 300 pages of "anonymous sources say"
Also, good point ont he Duke lacrosse thing. She destroyed those kids, long after the rest of the world could obviously say they were innocent.
9:46 pm on May 11th, 2009
Duke lacrosse kids innocent??? I guess technically…FN A-rod deserves it