Comments on: Redskins Can Keep Their Racially Insensitive Name

By: Garett

Garett — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:53:44 +0000

Why is it no one notices the other mascots? I mean, look at the Minnesota Vikings, that’s a white mascot, but you don’t see a bunch of Nordic people screaming and complaining about it being demeaning. There are plenty of other teams out there that use white people or a white person as the mascot, many that I find stupid, such as Big Red for Nebraska or The Mountaineer for West Virginia, but you don’t see me up in arms about it. It’s a mascot for a team, not an attack on a race. I seriously doubt any of those teams even think about what their mascot is, they are too busy concentrating on the many aspects of the GAME.

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:21:26 +0000

Quit your whining, none of these images are offensive or rude.
You simply want to fight because some jackass woke up with a stick in his ass.
Call them the blackskins, hell call em the washington crackers

By: PJJ

PJJ — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:19:45 +0000

I sure hope they continue with the suit.
The only ethnicity that is treated the same way as an animal is Indian.
Boy, black skin would go over well.
HOw about the Washington Serbians?