<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UW-BYU Officiating Controversy Not Going Away</title>
	<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809</link>
	<description>Celebrity sports gossip since 2001</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Osi Umenyiora Autographed Jersey Owner</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-73434</link>
		<author>Osi Umenyiora Autographed Jersey Owner</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-73434</guid>
		<description>I am a Giants fan from Argentina. Very nice Giants information. 
I miss the days of Lawrence Taylor and Phil Simms. 
I hope to be in Chicago for a game this fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Giants fan from Argentina. Very nice Giants information.<br />
I miss the days of Lawrence Taylor and Phil Simms.<br />
I hope to be in Chicago for a game this fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3244</link>
		<author>That Guy</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3244</guid>
		<description>One thing that everyone is overlooking are the many non calls that the pac-10 refs didn't call through out the whole game. There was a clip and a few holding calls on UW that weren't called, so lets talk about the fairness in penalty calls. It was so lopsided its not even funny, so to have 1 or even 2 calls called was a miracle in it and of itself. I thought the cougars weren't going to get a call the whole game.  The second thing is that the kicker still had a chance to put the game in overtime. A 35 five yard kick should have been made. Heck as an EX soccer player I could have nailed that kick!!! For all intensive purposes it was a great game and the better team found a way to win. I give credit to the Cougars for making a play when it counts, just like last years Vegas Bowl and the games against Utah where they came back in both games at the end to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that everyone is overlooking are the many non calls that the pac-10 refs didn&#8217;t call through out the whole game. There was a clip and a few holding calls on UW that weren&#8217;t called, so lets talk about the fairness in penalty calls. It was so lopsided its not even funny, so to have 1 or even 2 calls called was a miracle in it and of itself. I thought the cougars weren&#8217;t going to get a call the whole game.  The second thing is that the kicker still had a chance to put the game in overtime. A 35 five yard kick should have been made. Heck as an EX soccer player I could have nailed that kick!!! For all intensive purposes it was a great game and the better team found a way to win. I give credit to the Cougars for making a play when it counts, just like last years Vegas Bowl and the games against Utah where they came back in both games at the end to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trudger</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3239</link>
		<author>Trudger</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3239</guid>
		<description>Without the penalty Wash. could have gone for two and won the game. At least it was an option. The penalty removed that option so they HAD to try the long kick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without the penalty Wash. could have gone for two and won the game. At least it was an option. The penalty removed that option so they HAD to try the long kick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not blind</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3237</link>
		<author>Not blind</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3237</guid>
		<description>You people are idiots. He clearly didn't throw it high in the air. The reason it left the screen is he tossed it over his shoulder and it went to the ground. The block of the PAT is irrelevant; Willingham was already calling for them to go for two. Get your heads out of your XXX's, Wazzu scum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people are idiots. He clearly didn&#8217;t throw it high in the air. The reason it left the screen is he tossed it over his shoulder and it went to the ground. The block of the PAT is irrelevant; Willingham was already calling for them to go for two. Get your heads out of your XXX&#8217;s, Wazzu scum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3172</link>
		<author>Brooks</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3172</guid>
		<description>The kid can't make a simple, mid-field, short FG. Gimme a break. How come there isn't more discussion about that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The kid can&#8217;t make a simple, mid-field, short FG. Gimme a break. How come there isn&#8217;t more discussion about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: littlebrothersyndrome</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3171</link>
		<author>littlebrothersyndrome</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3171</guid>
		<description>Are you coogs really talking ish after the beating you took Saturday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you coogs really talking ish after the beating you took Saturday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SDK24</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3167</link>
		<author>SDK24</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3167</guid>
		<description>Was Steve Bartman the one who blocked the kick?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Steve Bartman the one who blocked the kick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3166</link>
		<author>todd</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3166</guid>
		<description>I agree Mad Dog.  1) The rule is pretty clear, 2) Would a truly well coached player with a head on his shoulders have broken the rule?, and 3) they still let the FG get blocked which is what lost the game, not the call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Mad Dog.  1) The rule is pretty clear, 2) Would a truly well coached player with a head on his shoulders have broken the rule?, and 3) they still let the FG get blocked which is what lost the game, not the call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSUfan</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3165</link>
		<author>WSUfan</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3165</guid>
		<description>They won't be the only Cougar team beating UW this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They won&#8217;t be the only Cougar team beating UW this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3163</link>
		<author>Mad Dog</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/uw-byu-officiating-controversy-not-going-away-19809#comment-3163</guid>
		<description>How can people honestly say he simply "tossed the ball over his shoulder"???  He threw it so high into the air that it left the TV screen.  Of course it was a penalty.  Quit bitching and talk about the awful blocking on the PAT instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can people honestly say he simply &#8220;tossed the ball over his shoulder&#8221;???  He threw it so high into the air that it left the TV screen.  Of course it was a penalty.  Quit bitching and talk about the awful blocking on the PAT instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
