Uchitel: “F—ing Hooker” Lied About Tiger Affair

Rachel Uchitel (photos) gave a long first-person denial to the NEW YORK POST this morning. Most of her wrath was reserved for the two female sources of the story, though she did not name them. Using “f—ing hooker” and “trainwreck” to describe them, and claiming another did drugs, she said the sources overheard her booking a bachelor party that Tiger Woods would be attending on the phone.

Rachel Uchitel And Ashley Samson Seen Together - Uchitel said they never met

(’Recluse’ Uchitel with Ashley Samson, source she claimed she never met)

From that “four-hour” phone conversation, Uchitel said the sources somehow connected her to a relationship with Woods to the NATIONAL ENQUIRER.

I got a random phone call from somebody who needed to set up a bachelor party in Vegas. He said, ‘Tiger Woods was going to be with us, can you set us up?’ I said sure.

 … “[One of the sources] is just looking for a payday because she is a f- - -ing hooker and wants money. She just got a little smart for once and put some things together she could use for a story.

She also (superficially) addressed her checking into Woods’ hotel in Melbourne and her past alleged relationship with David Boreanaz of Fox-TV’s Bones.

Do you believe everything Rachel Uchitel said in her denial?

View Results

On the Enquirer spotting her at Woods’ hotel:

“They had a picture of me checking in. I never denied I was in Australia, but there was a guy standing next to me, except his picture wasn’t printed. I was down there with a couple of guys, a couple of friends and it’s none of anybody’s business what I was up to in Australia. That’s nobody’s business.

“But to say I checked in alone is a lie because whoever was following me clearly knows I was with somebody.

On Boreanaz:

“It’s the same story as the one with [”Bones” star] David Boreanaz a month ago. It was really embarrassing for me that they [the Enquirer] spent the last two weeks calling everyone in New York about me and Tiger and that spread like wildfire. I don’t want to comment on the David Boreanaz stuff. That one is a different ballgame than the Tiger Woods thing.

And finally, how she is really a “recluse” who “doesn’t go out”:

“It doesn’t look good because of stories in the past about me and other celebrities, and everybody thinks I’m just a celebrity f - - -er. Well the truth is, I live alone, I don’t have a boyfriend, and I have my gay best friend staying over most nights. I’m a recluse. I don’t go out, I stay home with my dogs and friends.

She’s has previously denied an affair with Woods several times. In these comments, she does give some supposed detail on why the sources, according to her, made up their story about her and Woods being together. But she doesn’t name those two sources and also doesn’t name the person who she says will “back her up” on her story about booking Woods a table.

As for Uchitel lashing out at the character of the sources, if those people are such horrible human beings, why was she hanging out with them? And in one case, going on a trip to Europe with one of the sources?

On the Australia “coincidence”, she provides no specifics on who she was with or why she was there.

And finally, she doesn’t deny her alleged affair with Boreanaz.

Yes, she names Woods. And gives details she claims are the reason for the misunderstanding, but beyond that, there’s nothing in the comments to the NEW YORK POST that, at least at the moment, prove that she didn’t have an affair with him.

Ironically, she says the sources don’t have any material details of her having an affair with Woods. But in her denial, she does the same thing she accuses the sources of doing. Giving us a bunch of unverifiable information that proves nothing.