LeBron James is, statistically, by far the greatest player in Cleveland Cavaliers history - by any measure.
(Cavs Fans Now Have Own ‘Decision’ To Make)
But it goes without saying that Dan Gilbert probably won’t be hoisting his number into the rafters anytime soon, but is that really fair?
Were the Cavs better off never having James? Is it appropriate to gauge his contribution to the city based on a month’s worth of profound bad judgement?