Ohio State announced today the NCAA has suspended football players Mike Adams, Dan Herron, DeVier Posey, Solomon Thomas and Terrelle Pryor for the first five games of next season. Also, Jordan Whiting is suspended for the first game of Ohio State’s 2010 season.
(Full release below)
The players will be eligible to play in the Sugar Bowl.
For Pryor, the suspension was a result of him selling awards. The Ohio State quarterback must repay $2,500 to charity for selling his 2008 Big Ten ring, his 2009 Fiesta Bowl Sportsmanship award and his 2008 Gold Pants.
Ohio State reported the violations to the NCAA on Dec. 20. The school will appeal the suspensions.
Here’s the entire NCAA press release:




Text of same NCAA release:
INDIANAPOLIS— Five football student-athletes (including receiver DeVier Posey, running back Dan Herron, left tackle Mike Adams and backup defensive end Solomon Thomas) from The Ohio State University must sit out the first five games of the 2011 season for selling awards, gifts and university apparel and receiving improper benefits in 2009, the NCAA has determined.
A sixth football student-athlete (linebacker Jordan Whiting) must sit out the first game in 2011 for receiving discounted services in violation of NCAA rules.
The violations fall under the NCAA’s preferential treatment bylaws.
In addition to missing five games next season, student-athletes Mike Adams, Daniel Herron, Devier Posey, Terrelle Pryor and Solomon Thomas must repay money and benefits ranging in value from $1,000 to $2,500. The repayments must be made to a charity.
Student-athlete Jordan Whiting must sit out the first game next year and pay $150 to a charity for the value of services that were discounted because of his status as a student-athlete.
“These are significant penalties based on findings and information provided by the university,” said Kevin Lennon, NCAA vice president of academic and membership affairs.
The decision from the NCAA student-athlete reinstatement staff does not include a withholding condition for the Allstate Sugar Bowl. The withholding condition was suspended and the student-athletes will be eligible to play in the bowl game Jan. 4 based on several factors.
These include the acknowledgment the student-athletes did not receive adequate rules education during the time period the violations occurred, Lennon said.
NCAA policy allows suspending withholding penalties for a championship or bowl game if it was reasonable at the time the student-athletes were not aware they were committing violations, along with considering the specific circumstances of each situation. In addition, there must not be any competitive advantage related to the violations, and the student-athletes must have eligibility remaining.
The policy for suspending withholding conditions for bowl games or NCAA championship competition recognizes the unique opportunity these events provide at the end of a season, and they are evaluated differently from a withholding perspective. In this instance, the facts are consistent with the established policy, Lennon said.
Gene Smith, associate vice president and director of athletics at Ohio State, said the university will “further enhance” its rules education in the future based on this situation.
“We were not as explicit with our student-athlete education as we should have been in the 2007-08 and 2008-09 academic years regarding the sale of apparel, awards and gifts issued by the athletics department,” Smith said. “We began to significantly improve our education in November of 2009 to address these issues. After going through this experience, we will further enhance our education for all our student-athletes as we move forward.”
The standard withholding condition in cases like these involving the five student-athletes is four games, or 30 percent of a season. A fifth game was added to the penalty because these student-athletes did not immediately disclose the violations when presented with the appropriate rules education, Lennon said.
“Once a student-athlete understands a violation has occurred, they must immediately come forward to report it,” he said. “That did not happen, so the additional one-game penalty was imposed.”
The university declared the student-athletes ineligible on Monday (Dec. 20) and requested reinstatement from the NCAA.
As part of their reinstatement, Adams must repay $1,000 for selling his 2008 Big Ten championship ring and Herron must repay $1,150 for selling his football jersey, pants and shoes for $1,000 and receiving discounted services worth $150.
Posey must repay $1,250 for selling his 2008 Big Ten championship ring for $1,200 and receiving discounted services worth $50, while Pryor must repay $2,500 for selling his 2008 Big Ten championship ring, a 2009 Fiesta Bowl sportsmanship award and his 2008 Gold Pants, a gift from the university.
Solomon must repay $1,505 for selling his 2008 Big Ten championship ring for $1,000, his 2008 Gold Pants for $350 and receiving discounted services worth $155.
During the reinstatement process, each case is evaluated based on the specific facts of the particular case by NCAA staff. Prior to reaching a decision, staff considers any guidelines established by the Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement, a student-athlete’s responsibility for the violation, as well as any mitigating factors presented by the institution.
The university can appeal the decision to the Division I NCAA Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement, an independent committee comprised of representatives from NCAA member colleges, universities and athletic conferences. This committee can reduce or remove the condition, but it cannot increase the staff-imposed conditions.
Reinstatement decisions are independent of the NCAA enforcement process and typically are made once the facts of the student-athlete’s involvement are determined. The reinstatement process is likely to conclude prior to the close of an enforcement investigation. It is NCAA policy not to comment on current, pending or potential investigations.







12:15 pm on December 23rd, 2010
And so Brooks was right. Props where its due, my friend. You Ohio State fans crying foul last night can finally admit that he was right.
12:16 pm on December 23rd, 2010
Paying that $2500 to a charity shouldn’t be any sweat for Turrell. That’s just walking around $$ for a stud like him.
12:29 pm on December 23rd, 2010
Why not suspend them for the Sugar Bowl?!
Oh yeah, that’s right because its all about MONEY. The hypocritical NCAA is all about the money. I almost forgot.
Don’t worry NCAA, I won’t watch the Sugar Bowl regardless.
12:59 pm on December 23rd, 2010
This iis crazy. F the NCAA. If this warrants a five game sus then I want Cam Newton out of college football all together. Take back all the awards NOw
1:04 pm on December 23rd, 2010
Hey, I know how we can celebrate the enormous intelliegence of these athletes……LET’S ALL GET TATTOOs!!! LOL What a bunch of mental midgets.
“Welcome to WalMart, may I get you a basket?”
1:05 pm on December 23rd, 2010
hey TURD pryor how much is that school pride worth enjoy your time at osu the NFL will chew you up and spit you out.as far as the ncaa what a bunch of phony two bit crooks.lets not hurt the sugar bowl so for being bad you can’t play against next years cupcakes.NCAA FOAD!
2:23 pm on December 23rd, 2010
Now I hear James on ESPN saying it is a sad situation because the players were selling there “precious mementos” to help family members lol So lets rob a bank whenever we feel we are in need… Although I hate the hypocrisy of the NCAA, Rules are effin Rules!
2:24 pm on December 23rd, 2010
Let’s see the clarity.
1.A.J.Green sells his jersey from a bowl and is given an immediate 4 game suspension.
2. Running back at USC is suspended for taking a golf cart ride across campus.
3. Steven Ridley is ruled ineligible for some unknown reason, for now, and his status for the bowl game is uncertain.
Yet for the LOVE of money:
1.Cecil Newton admits to solicitation of money. Cam is declared ineligible by Auburn (after the season is over) and less than 24 hours later is ruled eligible (because he had no knowledge. wink,wink)
2. And now, 5 OSU players are caught selling merchandise in exchange for services but get to wait until the following season to start their suspensions.
Ironic that the later 2 involve BSC games………I think not.
5:13 pm on December 23rd, 2010
It isn’t jsut about the bowl games. Its also because these are SEC and Big Ten schools. The Teflon and Kevlar Conferences.
5:19 pm on December 23rd, 2010
LSUfan, you’re missing one crucial point. And it’s getting downright annoying to have to point out this flaw in logic:
Cam Newton didn’t accept money. Bottom line. Ohio State and USC were caught red-handed. Guilty. And Auburn might ultimately be guilty too. But at the moment, there is *NO* evidence saying money changed hands. This story is getting older than an abandoned dishrag. Stop comparing that case to everything else.
Ohio State was guilty. Sure, it sucks. But like someone else just said - rules are “effin” rules.
9:52 pm on December 25th, 2010
Cam didn’t accept money? Whatever. They still ASKED for the money which is a serious black n white in the rulebook violation. Ever see Blue Chips? The idea that he didn’t know, or was shopped around to the highest bidder and just decided to go to auburn at no cost, is gullible beyond any sense.