<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Presidency At Risk Over Kevin Johnson?</title>
	<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/obama-presidency-at-risk-over-former-nbaer-24571</link>
	<description>Celebrity sports gossip since 2001</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: RoB68</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/obama-presidency-at-risk-over-former-nbaer-24571#comment-99413</link>
		<author>RoB68</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/obama-presidency-at-risk-over-former-nbaer-24571#comment-99413</guid>
		<description>Here are the 2 potential laws(amendments to the original IG act of 1978) that were broke in the firing of a man charged with the oversight of where our government spending goes:
&lt;strong&gt;[*3]&lt;/strong&gt;  SEC. 3. REMOVAL OF INSPECTORS GENERAL. (a) Establishments.--Section 3(b) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking the second sentence and inserting &#34;If an Inspector General is removed from office or is transferred to another position or location within an establishment, the President shall communicate in writing the reasons for any such removal or transfer to both Houses of Congress, not later than 30 days before the removal or transfer. Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit a personnel action otherwise authorized by law, other than transfer or removal.&#34;.(b) Designated Federal Entities.--Section 8G(e) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking &#34;shall promptly communicate in writing the reasons for any such removal or transfer to both Houses of the Congress.&#34; and inserting &#34;shall communicate in writing the reasons for any such removal or transfer to both Houses of Congress, not later than 30 days before the removal or transfer. Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit a personnel action otherwise authorized by law, other than transfer or removal.&#34;.

He was fired with no notice and no reason given........until a couple of days later.
This was all done because he reported that KJ  was breaking the law and was caught.
KJ stumped for and plays  b-ball with the Pres and is friends with the First Lady.
Ther&#39;s nothing funny going on here, is there.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the 2 potential laws(amendments to the original IG act of 1978) that were broke in the firing of a man charged with the oversight of where our government spending goes:<br />
<strong>[*3]</strong>  SEC. 3. REMOVAL OF INSPECTORS GENERAL. (a) Establishments.&#8211;Section 3(b) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking the second sentence and inserting &quot;If an Inspector General is removed from office or is transferred to another position or location within an establishment, the President shall communicate in writing the reasons for any such removal or transfer to both Houses of Congress, not later than 30 days before the removal or transfer. Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit a personnel action otherwise authorized by law, other than transfer or removal.&quot;.(b) Designated Federal Entities.&#8211;Section 8G(e) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking &quot;shall promptly communicate in writing the reasons for any such removal or transfer to both Houses of the Congress.&quot; and inserting &quot;shall communicate in writing the reasons for any such removal or transfer to both Houses of Congress, not later than 30 days before the removal or transfer. Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit a personnel action otherwise authorized by law, other than transfer or removal.&quot;.</p>
<p>He was fired with no notice and no reason given&#8230;&#8230;..until a couple of days later.<br />
This was all done because he reported that KJ  was breaking the law and was caught.<br />
KJ stumped for and plays  b-ball with the Pres and is friends with the First Lady.<br />
Ther&#39;s nothing funny going on here, is there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: der</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/obama-presidency-at-risk-over-former-nbaer-24571#comment-99404</link>
		<author>der</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/obama-presidency-at-risk-over-former-nbaer-24571#comment-99404</guid>
		<description>really? is that what will happen? you have it all figured out?  well hell...guess it&#39;s Mr. Touchdown &#39;12 eh?  i bow down to you...you apparently have it all figured out. phew. now i can sleep at night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really? is that what will happen? you have it all figured out?  well hell&#8230;guess it&#39;s Mr. Touchdown &#39;12 eh?  i bow down to you&#8230;you apparently have it all figured out. phew. now i can sleep at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Touchdown</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/obama-presidency-at-risk-over-former-nbaer-24571#comment-99358</link>
		<author>Mr. Touchdown</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/obama-presidency-at-risk-over-former-nbaer-24571#comment-99358</guid>
		<description>Obama is crooked, just like they all are.  There is no change, just more of the same.  The only difference is that in this case there is no one to blow the whistle.  When the Dems lose power, and it will happen, the investigations will enlightening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is crooked, just like they all are.  There is no change, just more of the same.  The only difference is that in this case there is no one to blow the whistle.  When the Dems lose power, and it will happen, the investigations will enlightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

