Comments on: Mark Whicker Quite Unapologetic Before Apology http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/mark-whicker-quite-unapologetic-before-apology-26006 Celebrity sports gossip since 2001 Fri, 25 May 2012 19:42:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Nathan http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/mark-whicker-quite-unapologetic-before-apology-26006#comment-120314 Nathan Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:34:09 +0000 http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/mark-whicker-quite-unapologetic-before-apology-26006#comment-120314 I wrote Mark an email about how it was inappropriate, and this was his response: "Thanks. It was neither satirical nor about a tragedy. It was an attempt to celebrate her release and to show how long 18 years really is, in a context everyone -- well, almost everyone -- can understand." Does this guy really think we are all that stupid? Down with Mark Whicker! I wrote Mark an email about how it was inappropriate, and this was his response:

“Thanks. It was neither satirical nor about a tragedy. It was an attempt to celebrate her release and to show how long 18 years really is, in a context everyone — well, almost everyone — can understand.”

Does this guy really think we are all that stupid? Down with Mark Whicker!

]]> By: phreejazz http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/mark-whicker-quite-unapologetic-before-apology-26006#comment-120234 phreejazz Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:52:19 +0000 http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/mark-whicker-quite-unapologetic-before-apology-26006#comment-120234 The question isn't whether the writer should get a pass on this, it's whether the editor should. Answer: no. The question isn’t whether the writer should get a pass on this, it’s whether the editor should. Answer: no.

]]> By: Stan http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/mark-whicker-quite-unapologetic-before-apology-26006#comment-120209 Stan Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:07:01 +0000 http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/mark-whicker-quite-unapologetic-before-apology-26006#comment-120209 Good for Brooks for exposing this clown. His column was totally inappropriate. Good for Brooks for exposing this clown. His column was totally inappropriate.

]]>