Veteran ESPN reporter Shelley Smith, who has been covering USC football training camp here in L.A., was apparently the first to break the news today that true freshman Matt Barkley will be the starting QB for the Trojans a week from Saturday against San Jose State. (With Ohio State in Columbus looming on Sept. 12.)
When I initially ran a search on the story, the above ESPN-sourced result was the very first to pop up - with Smith’s name attached. But when you clicked on THAT link to the story, mention of her had been removed. In fact, the account was from the ASSOCIATED PRESS.
(What the? ESPN-sourced piece replaced by AP Story on ESPN.com?)
Wot?
Having covered sports teams in the main media on a daily basis for 16 years, forgive me if I put my conspiratorial hat on for just one iota.
As paranoid as we know coaches, p.r. people and editors to be, I wouldn’t be surprised if someone at ESPN saw that Smith’s source was initially noted as “close to the freshman quarterback“, and had the initial Smith-credited piece replaced with the AP story.
Why? Because if USC Coach Pete Carroll knows there’s a mole close to Barkley feeding Smith information, he might object in some way to Smith covering the teamĀ - and stop that privileged flow of info.
Trust me when I tell you that is exactly the way some coaches and p.r. staff people think. They won’t forget who was able to report first what supposed to be team secrets.
Since the news of Barkley’s start hit the wires soon after Smith’s report, and her reportage wasn’t on an island, perhaps ESPN replaced the story to help her maintain her undercover status on the beat.
I know, total tinfoil hat stuff. But I saw that sort of thing go on countless times when I was covering teams. NEVER underestimate the paranoia of coaches and p.r. people.
I do realize though that the whole crediting Smith kerfuffle could end up being a tech glitch. It makes no sense that ESPN would break a story first then link to an AP account.
I’ll be at the USC scrimmage at the Coliseum on Saturday at 1130am PT to eyeball Barkley for the first time. I’ve heard conflicting reports on him so far. I’ll wait until I see him myself before I give you the straight dope on the kid.








5:04 pm on August 27th, 2009
Aaron Corp got jerked on this one. I knew Barkley was going to be the starting QB once PC said some bogus statements about Corp yesterday, “Corps progression was great, and he’s working hard to get back…”
5:09 pm on August 27th, 2009
Maybe Corp is hurt worse than they thought?
More likely, Carroll realizes he needs more than a game manager to be Ohio State. Barkley clearly has more upside.
If the overall team was stronger, Corp would’ve gotten the nod imo.
But I guess you could also argue the opposite.
5:27 pm on August 27th, 2009
True Freshman QB’s rarely win games, but they can lose you a bunch. I think USC goes 7-5 or 8-4 this year. They will lose to OSU, Oregon, Oregon State, California… and maybe ASU. PC is rebuilding for next year.
5:49 pm on August 27th, 2009
Aye I don’t disagree. This reeks of a little desperation. I’ll know more at the scrimmage on Saturday.
7:10 pm on August 27th, 2009
Phil Mushnick at the New York Post will LOVE this development. ESPN has a history of taking credit for stories it does not originate.
7:56 pm on August 27th, 2009
Am I being naive to think that perhaps ESPN posted a Smith-sourced “scoop” after the story had hit the wire?
Based on the timing of it, I did think Shelley was first. But I don’t have the ability to pull up the wire real time like Bristol.
4:49 am on August 28th, 2009
Consensus seems to be that Shelley ran into Barkley leaving the football office and was either told by him or realized something was going on and got the sourcing before PC wanted it released.
No other way PC private propaganda wing - USCRipsIt - doesn’t have the story first otherwise.