<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ESPN Grabs ESPNMiami.com From Cybersquatter</title>
	<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460</link>
	<description>Celebrity sports gossip since 2001</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Bobafet7</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460#comment-160557</link>
		<author>Bobafet7</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460#comment-160557</guid>
		<description>I know ESPN will never has a ESPNATLANTA site, because we already have EDSBS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know ESPN will never has a ESPNATLANTA site, because we already have EDSBS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cranky Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460#comment-160333</link>
		<author>Cranky Greg</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460#comment-160333</guid>
		<description>Cybersquatters give regular "Domainers" a bad name. Most domain investors stay far away from names that have possible copyright/trademark issues and stick with generic and/or descriptive keyword names.

For example, a domain investor might go for miamisportsnews.com or something, but not miamiespn.com. Or boisecomputers.com but not boisedellpcs.com, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cybersquatters give regular &#8220;Domainers&#8221; a bad name. Most domain investors stay far away from names that have possible copyright/trademark issues and stick with generic and/or descriptive keyword names.</p>
<p>For example, a domain investor might go for miamisportsnews.com or something, but not miamiespn.com. Or boisecomputers.com but not boisedellpcs.com, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marielena Abruna</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460#comment-160313</link>
		<author>Marielena Abruna</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460#comment-160313</guid>
		<description>I started buying geo domain names about 2 years ago.  I owe few more like ESPNMiami.com and .net  I do agree that ESPN can demand the transfer of the name but why are the registrars allowing their members to buy name like this one for example, without a warning?  Many sites do not even allow you to park domain names that can have this type of issues.  I blame the registrars.  Do not blame me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started buying geo domain names about 2 years ago.  I owe few more like ESPNMiami.com and .net  I do agree that ESPN can demand the transfer of the name but why are the registrars allowing their members to buy name like this one for example, without a warning?  Many sites do not even allow you to park domain names that can have this type of issues.  I blame the registrars.  Do not blame me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan R Young</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460#comment-160285</link>
		<author>Ryan R Young</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460#comment-160285</guid>
		<description>ESPN has the right to that domain name if this lady is using it as a parked/developed site and attempting to make money off the ESPN name.  For an example, if the lady used the site for a "business" with the letters "ESPN" in her business name, then they may be forced to purchase it from her if they wanted it.  But if she had any ads for Sports Center or anything else related to ESPN then she is clearly is using the name with the attempt to make a profit and therefore ESPN could demand for her to transfer ownership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESPN has the right to that domain name if this lady is using it as a parked/developed site and attempting to make money off the ESPN name.  For an example, if the lady used the site for a &#8220;business&#8221; with the letters &#8220;ESPN&#8221; in her business name, then they may be forced to purchase it from her if they wanted it.  But if she had any ads for Sports Center or anything else related to ESPN then she is clearly is using the name with the attempt to make a profit and therefore ESPN could demand for her to transfer ownership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It's about remnant advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460#comment-160276</link>
		<author>It's about remnant advertising</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460#comment-160276</guid>
		<description>The ESPN local movement is all about selling remnant ad space to local sponsors at a markup.  ESPN gets a ton of traffic, but little of it is actually sold.  By creating the facade of "city sites," ESPN can convince local advertisers to affiliate with the ESPN brand on articles that normally would run under national ROS.  It's a little contrived, but if they're making money on it, God bless them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ESPN local movement is all about selling remnant ad space to local sponsors at a markup.  ESPN gets a ton of traffic, but little of it is actually sold.  By creating the facade of &#8220;city sites,&#8221; ESPN can convince local advertisers to affiliate with the ESPN brand on articles that normally would run under national ROS.  It&#8217;s a little contrived, but if they&#8217;re making money on it, God bless them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skunky</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460#comment-160273</link>
		<author>skunky</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/espn-grabs-espnmiamicom-from-cybersquatter-27460#comment-160273</guid>
		<description>If you register a domain name, they take your money and register it in your name, you got here first, it's yours...obviously not, eh ? Big business bullying tactics...again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you register a domain name, they take your money and register it in your name, you got here first, it&#8217;s yours&#8230;obviously not, eh ? Big business bullying tactics&#8230;again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

