Pro hockey is hard. Really, really hard. Even if nobody hits you, the sheer level of fitness and endurance needed to skate (and skate well) for that long is beyond the reach of most people. And then there’s the hitting. Oh god, the hitting. Try getting knocked onto a sheet of ice by someone coming at you at about 20 miles per hour, then see if you ever want to do that again. You’d probably say no.

(This is actually what Martin Brodeur looks like. Maybe.)
So with the intense physical demands of the sport comes equally intense pain afterward, and it’s well-known that one of the main benefits of steroids and HGH is the increased recuperative ability of the body; you get better faster. But there are also sufficient drawbacks (see Alzado, Lyle) that they’re illegal and strictly monitored by every major sport. Except if it’s the playoffs, in which case the NHL just says, “whatever!” The COLUMBUS DISPATCH has the incredible details:
For all the prices paid to hoist the Stanley Cup, a fear of being caught taking banned substances is not among them.
The NHL’s performance-enhancing drug policy, enacted three years ago by the league and players union, does not permit testing during the playoffs and off-season. It’s a five-month window in which the only enforcement against doping is the honor system.
Even the players support a year-round testing program, according to the article; that stands in contrast to the reasoning behind the lack of testing given when the policy was enacted just three years ago, when they decided not to conduct tests during the playoffs “to avoid distractions.” No word on why the league also doesn’t test during the entire offseason; perhaps the players will be too focused on vacationing to be distracted.
Whether anyone’s taking advantage of the loophole remains a mystery, obviously; according to a survey of the Columbus Blue Jackets, none of the players whatsoever think the league has a doping problem, and there aren’t any even apocryphal rumors of use out there. We have a bit of a theory as to why: the hockey uniforms.
Allow us to explain.

Here, narcissism is essentially wasted: none of the “show” muscles are visible. For obvious, ice- and skate-based reasons, there is no exposed skin on their arms, nor do their uniforms closely reflect their body type; conversely, for example, you can look at Dwight Howard when he’s in uniform and know that he’s unbelievably jacked.
Oh, and we picked that picture for a reason. That’s Chris Chelios, workout warrior. He’s the hardest exerciser in the entire league, to the point that he rides an exercise bike in a sauna for 45 minutes (and he’s in his freaking 40s). But looking at him, all you see is the same amorphous mass that all hockey players resemble.
So sure, maybe the hockey players are clean. But the league shouldn’t be holding the door open and out-and-out daring them to start abusing PEDs during the playoffs and offseason, and that’s essentially what this rule does.






1:22 am on April 20th, 2009
This is why I exclusively wear hockey jerseys, so I can claim I'm ripped underneath. Luckily, I never get into situations where I might be exposed, since the ladies don't go for guys who exclusi
5:35 am on April 20th, 2009
Come on — Lyle Alzado? Nobody in the world believes (including 100 percent of his doctors) that his steroid use played any role whatsoever in his death. Of all of the side effects of steroids and HGH, brain cancer is nowhere near the list. Sorry, I'm just tired of seeing him as the example of what steroids do, when for all intents and purposes, they did nothing to him, long-term negative side effect-wise.
Performance enhancing? Yes. Death causing? Not really.
3:09 pm on April 20th, 2009
LK-
Sure juicer. Dont rip out any car seats after reading this.
2:00 pm on April 21st, 2009
I wouldn't be shocked if things go on during the playoffs. Its grueling. But there are no real anomaly career arcs in the NHL where a players best years are late into his career (like a Clemmens, for example). A guy like Chellios is a freak of nature, for sure, but he definitely has a career arc that peaked years ago. I like to believe its a mostly clean sport.
2:45 pm on April 21st, 2009
Anyone who has seen Evgeni Malkin, Alex Ovechkin or Sidney Crosby with their shirt off knows this is a complete joke.
3:30 pm on April 21st, 2009
The thing abut hockey is you don't have to be big to be a force, just look at Gretzky. Hockey is more about balance than about size and strength.
11:58 am on April 22nd, 2009
NHL players are also subject to IOC-sanctioned drug testing for the World Championships (which unlike in Basketball, happen every year) and the Olympics (and, indeed, anyone on the "Olympic consideration list" is subject to in-season testing during an Olympic year). To the best of my knowledge, only two of 250 or so players on those lists for Turin tested positive, and both of those were suspicious (Jose Theodore failed for using a hair treatment that he'd notified the NHL of in advance)
If the NHL has a drug problem, it's a stimulant issue - Gretzky freely discussed teammates' Sudafed popping in his book, for instance, and things have likely gotten more sophisticated since then. And I could probably see goons / enforcers, who aren't likely to ever get invited to international play, loading up on them in the offseason. But, as noted, when the greatest player to ever play the game is a 5'11" guy outweighed by most junior varsity players these days, it's obvious there's not much purpose in it.
1:14 pm on April 22nd, 2009
If there was a problem with steroids in the NHL, wouldn't we see players' heads the size of Bonds or McGwire or the average NFL player?