Mets’ Citi Field Throws Out Its First Phillies Fan

In case you were running a pool at the office about how many games would be played in Citi Field before a Phillies fan was thrown out of the park — and, really, why wouldn’t you be — I hope you chose zero. The first game in the Mets’ new digs was played this past Sunday between St. John’s and Georgetown, and before it even started, a Phillies fan had been asked to leave the stadium.

Reed Frazier

Reed Frazier is a 22-year old student at St. John’s who is a Television and Film Production major. He was at the game on Sunday to help broadcast the game over his university’s website, having a press pass and everything. Reed also had on a Phillies jacket because he’s a Phillies fan, and as it turns out, that’s unacceptable at Citi Field.

From THE 700 LEVEL:

I was then approached by a fellow student and co-worker who brought a St. John’s University jacket from the head of the department for me to wear. I said, “Thank you, but my jacket works perfectly well for me.” I then began preparing my camera for the game.

It was after the ceremonial first pitch (John Franco) and the national anthem that I was approached by another co-worker who insisted that I put on the jacket. He informed me that he is a Mets fan and he understands where I am coming from, but that I have to put on the jacket. I told him that in no way did it affect how I was to do my job, therefore I could not justify doing so. I said, “If I was wearing a Mets jacket, would this even be a problem?” He told me everyone had to wear the jackets. I pointed out that two of my fellow student workers were wearing their own jackets. I even offered to compromise by wearing the St. John’s University jacket beneath my Phillies jacket. He dismissed the idea and left.

I returned my attention to my camera. Moments later, the head of the department rumbled up the platform and stood beside me. I looked to my side.

He said, “You have to take off your jacket.”

I replied, “In no way does it affect the job I am doing. It is a nonissue.”

He responded by saying, “It is an issue with the Mets. You can either put on the jacket or leave.”

“Then, I’m leaving.”

Frazier then had the press pass ripped out his hand by the head of the department, and left the stadium to head home. In his letter to THE 700 LEVEL, Frazier goes on to say that he can’t be sure the Mets were actually behind it since they never confronted him first-hand. That being said, he’d still like an apology from both the Mets and St. John’s.

Personally I don’t see why the kid just didn’t take off the jacket. Yeah, he’s a Phillies fan and that’s fine, but when he was at the game, he was working. Sure, he wasn’t getting paid for it, but if he really wants to give this television thing a shot, he should probably get his priorities in order.

11 comments

  1. GravatarRymotat
    12:49 pm on April 1st, 2009

    This kid is a LOSER!!! Take the jacket off you moron. You are WORKING at the gam.

  2. Gravatartheoneandonlycob
    1:36 pm on April 1st, 2009

    Yeah, definitely a moron. I work for a television company and am a Red Sox fan. If I was going to work at any stadium or arena, I'd get fired for wearing any items related to a sport. That kid has a lot to learn if he wants to work in television.

  3. GravatarUncle Kracka
    1:50 pm on April 1st, 2009

    So when's this guy gonna sue the Mets?

  4. GravatarIHATEPHILLY
    2:27 pm on April 1st, 2009

    TYPICAL PHILLY TRASH

  5. Gravataruh
    2:45 pm on April 1st, 2009

    sorry children. but the kid has a right to sue. there was no dress code. esp. since two others were wearing their own jackets.

    violation of free speech. some of you might have heard of it.  it is something that allows for a web site like this to exist where all of you children can comment on people who are not around to defend themselves.

    plus, he was covering a college game(not mets) in a stadium that was paid for by TAXPAYERS. SOME OF WHOM ARE NOT METS FANS OR EVEN SPORTS FANS!

  6. GravatarQJR
    3:12 pm on April 1st, 2009

    Flaw in your thinking:

    Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequence.

  7. Gravatarduh
    3:22 pm on April 1st, 2009

    actually they have every right to tell him to take off the jacket. He was working for St.Johns and his supervisor gave him the option take it off or leave.  It has nothing to do with taxpayers or even the mets… It has everything to do with a stupid kid thinking the bs he pulls with his parents is gonna work with teachers and employers.

  8. GravatarEd Kranepool
    4:23 pm on April 1st, 2009

    What a disgrace.  I don't wear IBM shirts to my work computer job because they are our competetion.  He is lucky there wasn't Mets fans or the NYPD to beat some sense into his @ss.   I would have
    been glad to spill my $10.50 beer on his head.

  9. GravatarSteve
    4:28 pm on April 1st, 2009

    This is not a freedom of speech issue anyway.  An employer has every right to tell you how to dress at work.  At my work, we wear a suit and tie everyday… I can't walk in in jeans and a polo shirt and cry "freedom of speech". 

  10. Gravatarjason
    5:06 pm on April 1st, 2009
  11. Gravatarpbrown
    1:27 am on April 6th, 2009

    this is ridiculous. the kid's jacket should not have been an issue at all.

Leave a Reply