The ARIZONA REPUBLIC reports today that Charles Barkley pleaded guilty in a Scottsdale court to his New Year’s Eve DUI charge. He was popped that night for being over twice the legal limit - and subsequently provided us all with some additional entertainment.
(NBA commentator or villain in Tim Burton’s next animated feature?)
After the plea, a judge fined the TNT commentator $2,000 and sentenced him to 10 days in jail. That’s right, TEN.
That sentence though will be cut to five days if Barkley completes a “court-approved alcohol program.”
Even if he does five days in jail, that sounds a little stiff. I know he was over twice the legal limit, but I’m guessing if Barkley had lawyered up, he could’ve gotten off easier.
Either that or I know nothing about Maricopa County law, home of the pink pajama-doling Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
Normally celebs get off light when it comes to our beloved system of justice, but that usually only applies to serious cases. Insane media coverage now means that when a celeb gets popped for a lesser offense, courts delight in making a pseudo-stand against their crimes.
But based on Barkley’s appalling lack of contrition in his first interview after his arrest, the interview that wasn’t on TNT, in this particular case I think the judge actually got it right.







7:59 pm on February 23rd, 2009
I would like to see Frank Caliendo do an impersonation of Charles Barkley in jail.
7:59 pm on February 23rd, 2009
Only one word can sum up this sentencing - turrible.
8:02 pm on February 23rd, 2009
Harsh? I think this kind of sentence would be a good lesson for other sports celebrities to learn - if you're drunk & looking for a blowjob, have her come to you.
8:07 pm on February 23rd, 2009
Charles is just lucky he didn't kill anyone.
9:16 pm on February 23rd, 2009
Sir Charles sure takes a better mug shot than Nick Nolte.
6:21 am on February 24th, 2009
10 days with 5 days "good behavior" sounds correct.
barkley is being treated just like any other citizen.
and i'm surprised the writer doesn't believe, as he writes, that dui at twice the legal linit is a 'serious crime.'
it is. it potentially has deadly consequences.
good for sir charles to accept the consequences to his bad choice.
learn, don't do it again, and move on.
lar