<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A-Roid? Rodriguez Tested Positive in &#8216;03, Says SI</title>
	<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/a-roid-rodriguez-tested-positive-in-03-says-si-22198</link>
	<description>Celebrity sports gossip since 2001</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: 'splainer</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/a-roid-rodriguez-tested-positive-in-03-says-si-22198#comment-56654</link>
		<author>'splainer</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/a-roid-rodriguez-tested-positive-in-03-says-si-22198#comment-56654</guid>
		<description>Let me &#39;splain it to youse. Stat Man seems to not understand the meaning of &#34;almost,&#34; while Anonymous seems to think the nearly 1200 figure was calculated, rather than the published number. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me &#39;splain it to youse. Stat Man seems to not understand the meaning of &quot;almost,&quot; while Anonymous seems to think the nearly 1200 figure was calculated, rather than the published number. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzCal</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/a-roid-rodriguez-tested-positive-in-03-says-si-22198#comment-56482</link>
		<author>BuzzCal</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/a-roid-rodriguez-tested-positive-in-03-says-si-22198#comment-56482</guid>
		<description>This is no surprise!  For years everyone suspected A-Rod was juicing and Canseco even called him out.  MLB needs to figure out a way to restore their image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is no surprise!  For years everyone suspected A-Rod was juicing and Canseco even called him out.  MLB needs to figure out a way to restore their image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/a-roid-rodriguez-tested-positive-in-03-says-si-22198#comment-56479</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/a-roid-rodriguez-tested-positive-in-03-says-si-22198#comment-56479</guid>
		<description>How do you get 1200?

Maybe over the course of the season 1200 people will be put on a 25-man roster. The most players in the MLB at any one time during the season though is 750. 

With the 104 players, were all players tested? Or was it just something like 250 random players were tested and 104 showed up positive? I would like to hear a percentage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you get 1200?</p>
<p>Maybe over the course of the season 1200 people will be put on a 25-man roster. The most players in the MLB at any one time during the season though is 750. </p>
<p>With the 104 players, were all players tested? Or was it just something like 250 random players were tested and 104 showed up positive? I would like to hear a percentage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stat Man</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/a-roid-rodriguez-tested-positive-in-03-says-si-22198#comment-56473</link>
		<author>Stat Man</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/a-roid-rodriguez-tested-positive-in-03-says-si-22198#comment-56473</guid>
		<description>104 out of 1200 is less than 10%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>104 out of 1200 is less than 10%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

